War Mom vs. Peace Mom
Why is this administration (and even more so all the idiot pundits and bloggers on the right) making this into an issue of one against the other? Both of these moms have the right to speak their minds about the war or anything else for that matter, as do all Americans. Seems pretty simple to me.
23 comments:
It's simple because you have common sense and are reality-based, JRH.
If only they did both have the right? Today opposition is seen as treason and it needs to be crushed immediately. The people who are afraid of Sheehan want to make this her against the troops or her against other families. Bush can't win any debate with her, so they need pawns. People who may honestly feel that Sheehan is not right but are being used by those in power to pass the attention from them.
I kind of wish that Sheehan would fade more to the background. I wrote about it a couple of weeks ago that she was at the verge of her cause being lost in politics and that has almost become true. I support her, but wish the situation was handled a little better
JRH
You know we disagree on this one. However I stopped by to send best wishes.
Why do you disagree beakerkin, do you think one of doesn't have the right to express their opinion?
I think the administration hunted the Pruett family down in order to use them as a Sheehan foil deliberately for PR.
Bush is failing just fine without any help from me. And it would be nice if we could have a united front, but that's not possible when the people in charge think they are infallible and cannot recognize any mistakes. Are we supposed to pretend they are doing a good job, just on the off chance that being united is enough to overcome all the stupid decisions?
Blogenlust's law in action! Congratulations, ASND, on re-inforcing this law. Only 9 comments before somebody blamed Clinton for one of Bush's mistakes.
You're right that Bush's failure is not his alone, but the US's, which is why I didn't vote for him, I would prefer not to be associated with anything the idiot does.
You guys can point the finger at Clinton all you like, but the fact is, when Clinton was President things were going pretty well in this country in a lot of different ways, and now they just aren't. Obviously there are a lot of other factors involved, but that's the bottom line. Whether it is Bush's fault how things are now or not, it's still his job to help fix them.
Sheehan is typical of most libs. To say we support the troops but not what they're doing is bull?*;/!!!! Your hatred for Bush is your right. But don't belittle those who are brave enough to fight for you and me by talking out of both sides of your mouth. To protest outside Walter Reed is a total discrace to everything her son died for.
Who is belittling anyone? I've seen plenty on the right belittling Sheehan, but I haven't seen anyone on the left insulting the troops as you suggest.
And yes, Howard ryhmes with coward, congratulations on that amazing discovery. Interesting coming from someone afraid to put their name on their thoughts.
You don't think that to protest the war outside a hospital where the troops can listen to your hatred for the commander in chief, and what they fought for isn't belittling just shows how pointless it is to even waste time trying to get it through your thick skulls how foolish you look.......
Would you rather they protest in someone's basement where no one can hear them? What would be the point of that? You protest where you will be heard. That's one of the rights we have as Americans. So what is it you think they're fighting for, anyway, if you don't even believe in that?
John
Free speech is something we all agree upon and practice in our blogs with a noteable exception. Generally you could come to my blog and find 100% personal attacks with zero content. I can not name a single moderate or Conservative blogger who censors comments. This is readily practiced by the far left that generaly does not include you or even the disturbed Chemist . Both of you are liberals who I can respect but disagree with.
Sheehan is a far left lunatic who associates and voices the rhetoric of three Commie Front Groups UPJ , ANSWER and Code Pink. The media portrayal of Sheehan as a typical military mother is a fabrication. She has also said anti semitic statements including blaming Israel for her son's death. I understand the woman is mourning but a blood libel and questioning the patriotism of Jews is reprehensible.
The truth is the woman is in clear need of medication and profesional help and I do not say that lightly. For the far left to use a mentaly disturbed woman is typical of the boorish behavior of US Communists.
Disgruntled, beakerkin. I am disgruntled.
And to the ever-so-brave anonymous commenter above, who said "To say we support the troops but not what they're doing is bull?*;/!!!!", I don't think you understand the anti-war message.
We're only against what the troops are being made to do because of a pack of lies. I blame Bush for that. I don't blame some 25 year old Seargant for US foreign policy - that would just be stupid. My quarrel is with the fact that the Iraq war exists in the first place; it is most certainly not with the soldiers themselves. Hell, I've got a family member in Iraq - do you?
No Chemist I think disturbed is more approprite. Disgruntled is reserved for people who work in the private sector. They are over worked under appreciated and under real pressure. They are not appreciated at work or often by their kids. Yet they work every day
and guess what is the first topic of conversation Gas Taxes. I guess ecology comes before the working man.
You work in accademia and I am now part of the government. Neither of us have a right to be disgruntled.
Why do you think that the word 'disgruntled' should be reserved for people in the private sector? You never heard of a disgruntled postal worker?
From the Cambridge dictionary online:
disgruntled
adjective
unhappy, annoyed and disappointed about something
Seems like it can work for any kind of person, no matter what their job happens to be. Besides, my job isn't what makes me unhappy, annoyed and disappointed. It's the President of the United States that does that.
I was a troop and still have friends who are troops. They were more upset when I wasn't openly against the war than when I was because they know me and know that it is not any agenda other than getting our troops what they deserve. The problem with this war is that people are more concerned about gas prices than what is going on in Iraq. The working man who is getting screwed by higher prices is getting screwed because the wealthy and now oil companies have been given huge tax breaks.
I don't want to hear a damn thing about liberals not supporting the troops. I am tired of the argument and it is a tired argument. Having ribbons and supporting the president does nothing for the troops. We should have cut all the pork out of the transportation bill, rolled back the tax cuts, and actually supported the military. But, let's be honest and admit that to the people who support Bush, lower taxes are far more important than actually supporting the troops.
Yes and there is also the issue of the American public fixating on media circus shows as their way to get into issues. I don't mean to compare poor Mrs. Sheehan to the Schiavo family, but Geez...are blogs the only place where people are thinking?
Chemist
What have you and your cohorts done for working people ? Raise gas taxes, beer taxes, cigarette taxes and restrict hunting are great with the tofu crowd but it upsets rural folks to no end. I guess being for working people is just a slogan. The locals in Vermont complain about how out of touch some of you are.
Gas taxes hurt rural working people
but pleasing the tofu crowd is more important. When you tax cigarettes beer and gas you are aiming at rural folks lifestyle.
Maybe you should get out from behind your accademic chair and talk to rural folks. I left the big city and am learning every day.
Do not be surprised if VT and NH go Republican. People are fed up and they are talking about gas taxes.
Chemist I worked in the private sector, government and accademia briefy. You have zero clue how tough it is in the real world. Stay in college and be a low rent Chomskyite. It is much easier then
defending your country or working under real pressure in the private sector.
Ok, so if we want to actually succeed in Iraq, we have to do it better than we are now, but in order for anything to change, we have to point out how badly it is going, but then you say we're finger pointing. It would be nice if our leaders would actually define success in Iraq, then maybe they'd have a better chance of obtaining it.
So what do we have to wait until Bush says he's done until we can evaluate his work in any way? The ridiculous expectations were not set by the anti-war people, they were set by the administration. If they aren't happy being judged according to them, then they probably should have been more realistic in the first place.
John
I do respect you and have limited respect for the disintered Chemist.
However maybe you should look at the anti semitism comming from the left.
Howard Dean and now even Susan Estrich are noticing. There is a serious problem that I identified.
When bloggers write regularly about
zionist media and Jewish Cabals manipulating the country into war we have veered into hate speech.
There is a problem and it is not you as you are clearly not a bigot.
The Chemist has excused this excess. Now that Howard Dean and Estrich who are not Conservatives
have commented perhaps you should look again. The problem with some of you liberals is you talk a good game about anti semitism . However when a far left bufoon spouts off regularly about Zionist media all of you are silent.
If Falwell spoke of a velvet mafia in Hollywood you would be all over him. I would laugh as it is stupid and agree with you. Anti Semitism on the far left is alive and well.
Post a Comment