Wired News: Bush Fiddles While Specter Burns

Can someone please explain to me how it is any better morally to destroy this precious life later after it has sat around frozen for however long and is then discarded than it is to destroy it now with a noble purpose in mind? Are there women lining up to implant these embryos into their uteruses, if only they could save them from being used for research? Because I don't think there are. So, one way or another, these things will be destroyed. I guess having moral absolutes like this just really means that you'd rather be able to blame the exact same outcome on someone else.